Framing Solastalgia: Unfolding the Psychological & Public Health Dimensions of Being Homesick at Home

Sirisha Kuchibhotla, Steinhardt '26

Bachelor of Science: Global Public Health/Applied Psychology

Introduction

Environmental degradation and climate change are among the most pressing challenges of the 21st century, with profound implications not only for ecosystems but also for human well- being. Beyond the tangible effects of rising temperatures, biodiversity loss, and natural disasters, there is a growing recognition of the psychological and public health impacts associated with these changes. The concept of solastalgia has emerged as a critical lens for understanding the emotional and mental health consequences of environmental change, particularly as communities worldwide grapple with the accelerating impacts of climate crises. To address these gaps, this study seeks to systematically review the literature for how scholars frame solastalgia concerning its psychological and public health dimensions, identifying prevailing themes and theoretical approaches while uncovering underexplored areas.

Background

Solastalgia, a term introduced by Glenn Albrecht in 2005, describes the emotional distress caused by environmental change or degradation while remaining physically present in the affected area. Derived from "solace" and the Greek "algia" (pain), it reflects the grief, anxiety, and loss of belonging when familiar surroundings undergo detrimental shifts. Unlike nostalgia, which is tied to longing for a past place, solastalgia arises from witnessing environmental deterioration, encompassing feelings like helplessness, trauma, and eco-anxiety (Albrecht, 2005; Ágoston et al., 2022). It is linked to both gradual changes, such as deforestation and sea-level rise, and acute crises like wildfires and flooding (Askland & Bunn, 2018). This concept highlights the intersection of environmental change, identity, and psychological resilience.

Solastalgia is central to studies on environmental health, psychology, and climate change, capturing the emotional toll of ecological degradation (Cianconi et al., 2023). It offers insights into societal vulnerabilities and highlights the disproportionate burden on marginalized communities, which face heightened distress with limited resources to adapt. Research demonstrates solastalgia’s role in exacerbating communal challenges in regions affected by rising sea levels, droughts, and pollution, positioning it within climate justice discourse (Ferrarello, 2023; Borges, 2024). Recognizing solastalgia aids in developing interventions and policies to enhance psychological resilience amidst escalating climate impacts.

Solastalgia was introduced to describe the psychological effects of environmental disruptions, initially focusing on rural and Indigenous communities affected by industrial activities (Albrecht, 2005). Over time, its scope has expanded to include urban and coastal populations facing climate- related crises like floods and wildfires (Cianconi et al., 2020; Leviston et al., 2023). The concept has evolved to include "anticipated solastalgia," preemptive distress about future environmental changes (Moratis, 2021). Studies link solastalgia to mental health conditions like depression and PTSD, underscoring its importance in understanding and addressing the psychological dimensions of ecological change (Testoni et al., 2019).

Statement of Need

As climate change increasingly disrupts ecosystems and societies, its psychological toll demands attention. Solastalgia, the distress experienced when witnessing environmental degradation without displacement, underscores the emotional burdens of ecological change. Vulnerable populations, such as those losing landscapes, biodiversity, or livelihoods, face heightened risks, necessitating tailored interventions for issues like eco-anxiety and eco-grief (Cianconi et al., 2023). An interdisciplinary approach involving psychology, sociology, and public

health is essential for context-specific strategies that enhance resilience. Moreover, integrating solastalgia into climate adaptation policies acknowledges its broader psychological and existential implications, fostering a deeper understanding of the human dimensions of environmental crises.

Despite growing recognition, critical gaps remain in solastalgia research. Measurement tools like the Brief Solastalgia Scale (Christensen et al., 2024) are limited, highlighting the need for standardized assessments across diverse populations. Additionally, the long-term psychological effects of solastalgia, particularly in communities facing recurrent challenges, are underexplored. Socioeconomic and cultural factors shaping solastalgia, especially in urban and affluent groups, remain inadequately studied. Limited research on intersections with mental health conditions, such as PTSD and depression, and the psychological impacts of climate policies and grassroots movements further impede comprehensive understanding (Rehling & Sigston, 2020; White et al., 2023).

Closing these gaps could lead to transformative outcomes. Evidence-based interventions, such as trauma-informed counseling and community resilience programs, would address eco- distress more effectively (Cunsolo et al., 2020). Policy integration could enhance disaster response, include mental health in climate adaptation, and promote ecological restoration projects to rebuild a sense of place (Moratis, 2021). Expanding solastalgia research shifts the climate narrative by emphasizing human emotional costs, fostering empathy, and mobilizing urgent action. At the community level, understanding solastalgia can strengthen social cohesion, enabling collective efforts for resilience and sustainable development (Borges, 2024).

Objectives

The following research objectives for this study aim to deepen the understanding of solastalgia by exploring its psychological and public health dimensions and advancing the academic discourse around this critical concept:

1. To review the literature for how scholars frame solastalgia concerning its psychological and public health dimensions.

2. To identify common themes and theoretical frameworks used in the study of solastalgia and uncover gaps to suggest areas for future research.

Research Question

How do scholars frame "Solastalgia" to address the psychological and health repercussions of environmental change?

Methodology

This study adopts a literature review approach to analyze existing research base on solastalgia, focusing on its psychological and public health dimensions.

Study Eligibility Criteria

Study Inclusion Criteria

1. Relevance to solastalgia and climate change
2. Relevance to eco-anxiety, eco-grief, and climate anxiety
3. Geographic and demographic diversity
4. Mental and public health outcomes v.
5. Articles published from 2000 onwards
6. Peer-reviewed articles

Study Exclusion Criteria

1. Irrelevant to solastalgia, or related concepts
2. Non-peer-reviewed articles
3. Duplicate or highly similar articles

Information Sources

Databases Searched

1. PubMed
2. Web of Science
3. Google Scholar

Expert Interviews

Expert 1

Fiona Fogarty, MPH (Adjunct Lecturer; NYU School of Global Public Health)

Expert 2

Professor, Applied Psychology, NYU Steinhardt (Note: This expert asked to remain confidential.)

Results

Study Characteristics

The following table (Fig: Table 1) presents a summary of all the studies analyzed in this review. It highlights key categories, and details regarding the type of design, population, context, geographic and thematical diversity in the included studies.

Table 1

Study Characteristics Summary Table

Study Summary Table

The following table (Fig: Table 2) presents a synthesized overview of the studies analyzed in this review. It highlights key details, including authorship, publication year, study context, population focus, methodology, and primary findings.

Table 2

Summary Of Studies In The Review

Interview Insights

The insights from the interview have been collectively condensed into the discussion. However, both the experts were trying to find cases in history and their experiences as instances of solastalgia throughout the interview. This led to a deep dive into them talking extensively about Mossville, Louisiana, and Camp Lejeune. Emergent themes included a sense of helplessness in the face of rapid change, the importance of community resilience, intergenerational impact, and the psychological toll of witnessing environmental destruction.

Case Study of Mossville, Louisiana

“When we think about the environment and community, we see the built environment and the natural environment. They are inextricably linked to how we operate in the community, and community is vital to mental health. We see the example of Mossville Louisianna, where this vibrant community was torn apart by their environment being polluted from industry. This resulted in people dying young or moving away, a lot of people couldn't afford to sell their homes because nobody would buy them. When you have then these gaps, homes being left in disrepair because there is no money to demolish them, schools that no longer have enough students, and playgrounds where children no longer play, it reaps havoc on mental health to see the last vestiges of happier times.”

- Prof. Fiona Fogarty

Mossville, an unincorporated African American community in southwestern Louisiana, was founded in the 18th century by formerly enslaved individuals. Over generations, it became a symbol of resilience and cultural heritage, with its residents maintaining strong ties to the land. However, in the latter half of the 20th century, Mossville became encircled by heavy industrial activity, with 14 petrochemical plants established within close proximity. These facilities emitted toxic pollutants, including dioxins, which are known to cause cancer, reproductive issues, and other severe health problems. The environmental degradation of Mossville’s air, water, and soil profoundly disrupted the community’s connection to its surroundings, eroding its identity and sense of place (David and Goliath in “Mossville: When Great Trees Fall,” 2024). Residents reported not only physical health impacts but also psychological distress, including grief, helplessness, and a pervasive sense of loss. This aligns closely with the concept of solastalgia, where environmental transformation leads to emotional suffering for individuals who feel powerless to halt the degradation of their home environment (Rogers, 2016).

Mossville’s decline also illustrates the compounded effects of systemic marginalization. Despite residents raising concerns for decades, their voices were often ignored, and regulatory responses were insufficient (Purifoy & Purifoy, 2023). Eventually, many residents were forced to relocate as petrochemical companies offered buyouts. While relocation addressed immediate physical risks, it further deepened psychological impacts by severing residents from the land that carried deep historical, cultural, and familial significance (Wilder, 2024). The case of Mossville underscores the need for multidisciplinary approaches to environmental degradation, combining ecological restoration with policies addressing systemic inequities. Moreover, it highlights how solastalgia disproportionately affects marginalized communities, compounding the challenges of resilience and recovery (Rogers, 2016).

This case aligns with research by Albrecht et al. (2007) on solastalgia and demonstrates the critical importance of integrating environmental justice frameworks into both policy-making and mental health interventions.

Case Study of Camp Lejeune

Camp Lejeune, a United States Marine Corps base in North Carolina, serves as a poignant example of solastalgia, revealing how environmental degradation profoundly disrupts both physical and emotional ties to a place. Between the 1950s and 1980s, the base’s water supply was contaminated by hazardous chemicals, including trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), and benzene—substances linked to cancers, neurological disorders, and other chronic illnesses (Council, 2009). This contamination affected over one million Marines, their families,

and civilian staff, fostering a legacy of illness, grief, and psychological trauma. At Camp Lejeune, solastalgia manifested in the profound betrayal of trust and connection to a place that symbolized security, community, and national service. For military families, the base represented not just a workplace but a home (Bove et al., 2014). Children attended schools there, families built memories, and many viewed it as a symbol of pride in service to their country (Cancer Incidence Study, 2024). The realization that the environment they trusted had been poisoning them evoked feelings of helplessness, anger, and grief.

Unlike traditional cases of solastalgia, which often involve visible environmental degradation, Camp Lejeune’s contamination was insidious, hidden from view for decades. This invisibility amplified the psychological toll, as residents grappled with the betrayal of safety in a place they had considered a sanctuary. Many experienced anticipatory grief, knowing they or their loved ones might develop debilitating illnesses years after exposure. The military's delayed acknowledgment and insufficient initial response compounded the emotional impacts (Team, 2024). Veterans and their families struggled to secure recognition, healthcare, and compensation, exacerbating their sense of abandonment and powerlessness. This institutional apathy mirrors broader themes of solastalgia, where governing bodies fail to protect communities from environmental harm, deepening the psychological wounds (Bell Legal Group, 2024).

Camp Lejeune also highlights the intergenerational dimensions of solastalgia. Children exposed to the contamination have grown up bearing the health and emotional scars of their environment, perpetuating a cycle of grief and loss tied to the land (Bove et al., 2014). This case underscores the importance of addressing the psychological impacts of environmental degradation alongside physical health concerns. It illustrates how solastalgia can arise in contexts beyond natural disasters or climate change, encompassing human-made environmental crises with long-term psychological and social repercussions. Camp Lejeune remains a sobering reminder of how environmental negligence can fracture communities and erode their sense of identity, safety, and belonging.

Discussion

As climate change intensifies and environmental degradation accelerates, the concept of solastalgia has gained prominence in both academic and policy spheres. It serves as a lens through which the intersection of environmental change, psychological well-being, and identity can be examined. Understanding solastalgia requires an exploration of the theoretical frameworks that support its conceptualization, the evolution of its definitions, and its contextual applications in diverse settings.

Framing of Solastalgia

Theoretical Frameworks

The concept of solastalgia is embedded within a variety of theoretical frameworks that span multiple disciplines, including psychology, environmental studies, sociology, and anthropology. These frameworks provide a multifaceted understanding of how environmental changes, both gradual and abrupt, trigger emotional responses that can have profound implications for mental health, societal structures, and cultural identity.

The Place Attachment Theory explains the emotional bonds individuals form with their environments, which contribute to identity, well-being, and stability (Hernandez et al., 2007). Environmental degradation disrupts these bonds, leading to solastalgia—a grief-like response to losing familiar landscapes. Rural and coastal communities, reliant on natural environments for livelihoods and culture, experience heightened distress due to events like deforestation, erosion,

or industrial pollution (Borges, 2024; Phillips & Murphy, 2021). Lazarus and Folkman’s framework (1984) of Psychosocial Stress-Coping Model highlights two coping strategies for environmental distress: emotion-focused (e.g., activism, emotional support) and problem-focused (e.g., sustainable practices, policy advocacy). These strategies help mitigate both environmental damage and its psychological toll (Cianconi et al., 2020; Albrecht et al., 2007). Solastalgia, introduced by Albrecht (2005), is a "psychoterratic syndrome" caused by ongoing environmental changes. Unlike eco-grief or eco-anxiety, solastalgia is rooted in present distress. Studies link it to mental health issues in regions facing droughts, crop failures, and land degradation (Kumar et al., 2021). This framework of the Psychoterratic Syndromes Framework connects environmental changes to societal and cultural impacts, such as reduced community cohesion.

Definitions, Conceptualization of the Sense of Place and Contextual Frameworks

Solastalgia refers to the distress caused by environmental changes that disrupt safety, belonging, or identity (Albrecht, 2005). Initially tied to immediate degradation, the concept now encompasses related emotional phenomena like eco-anxiety, eco-grief, and eco-guilt (Cianconi et al., 2020). These responses often overlap, with solastalgia serving as a precursor to deeper emotional states (Cunsolo et al., 2020).

The sense of place reflects emotional and cultural ties to specific locations, shaping identity and well-being (Relph, 1976; Tuan, 1977). Environmental changes disrupt these ties, leading to grief over both physical landscapes and cultural histories. Rural and Indigenous communities, where land holds spiritual and cultural significance, experience collective solastalgia from disruptions like deforestation or mining (Tupou et al., 2023). In urban areas, solastalgia arises from loss of green spaces or neighborhood transformation, challenging community cohesion (Cresswell, 2004).

The urban versus rural dichotomy in solastalgia is highly evident. Urban solastalgia often stems from diminishing green spaces and environmental degradation, leading to alienation and grief (Goulart et al., 2020). In rural areas, solastalgia is linked to livelihood loss and cultural erosion caused by land degradation or water scarcity (Kumar et al., 2021). Natural disasters, such as hurricanes or wildfires, trigger severe solastalgia by rapidly transforming landscapes and severing community ties. The emotional toll includes anxiety, depression, and collective grief over cultural losses (Picou et al., 2009; Albrecht et al., 2020). For Indigenous communities, land holds spiritual and cultural meaning. Environmental changes or destruction of sacred sites lead to profound cultural trauma and collective solastalgia, disrupting ancestral connections and traditions (Tupou et al., 2023).

Psychological Dimensions of Solastalgia

The psychological dimensions of solastalgia capture the profound emotional and cognitive experiences resulting from environmental change. As a form of distress that emerges from the disintegration of an individual’s connection to their home environment, solastalgia manifests in diverse psychological patterns.

Grief and Loss

Solastalgia arises from disrupted bonds with natural environments, leading to ongoing grief tied to place attachment. Unlike traditional grief, it stems from environmental degradation, such as deforestation, biodiversity loss, or cultural disconnection (Albrecht et al., 2007). Collective grief is common, as seen in Arctic Inuit communities mourning icy landscapes central to their identity or Australian farmers affected by drought. Anticipatory grief over future losses, like rising sea levels in Tuvalu, amplifies distress. This grief often results in depression, anxiety, and PTSD but can also foster community solidarity (Cunsolo et al., 2013).

Ecological Anxiety

Eco-anxiety reflects chronic fear of environmental decline, driven by threats like climate change and biodiversity loss. Symptoms include fear, guilt, and helplessness, exacerbated by media coverage and inadequate societal responses (Hickman et al., 2021). Younger generations experience "climate generation anxiety" over inheriting a declining planet. The phenomenon is culturally varied, with Indigenous groups linking it to ancestral land loss and urban communities facing pollution and hazards (Whyte, 2018).

Helplessness and Powerlessness

Environmental degradation often leaves individuals feeling powerless, compounding distress. Rural communities experiencing desertification or Indigenous groups witnessing ancestral land destruction face heightened helplessness (Albrecht et al., 2007). Marginalized populations, with limited resources to address environmental challenges, suffer disproportionately. This lack of agency leads to chronic emotional distress, demanding systemic and community-based solutions to restore empowerment (Pihkala, 2020).

Identity and Belonging

Environmental degradation disrupts the strong ties between identity, belonging, and place. For many, landscapes symbolize cultural heritage, traditions, and personal memories (Whyte, 2018). Indigenous communities, whose cultural identity is inseparable from the environment, suffer profound losses when sacred sites are destroyed. Urbanization or displacement from natural disasters fragments communities, eroding both individual and collective identity (Scannell & Gifford, 2017).

Depression and Emotional Numbness

Depression and emotional numbness are key psychological effects of solastalgia, caused by witnessing environmental degradation. Unlike temporary sadness, these feelings are enduring, stemming from a sense of loss and existential disorientation. Depression manifests as chronic sadness, lethargy, and hopelessness, often worsened by visible environmental changes (Higginbotham et al., 2010). Emotional numbness, a coping mechanism, leads to detachment from emotions and surroundings, causing apathy and alienation (Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018). Prolonged environmental stress, isolation, and broken community networks further intensify these conditions (Pihkala, 2020).

Isolation and Alienation

Isolation and alienation arise when environmental change disrupts social and ecological bonds. Forced migration and landscape degradation create physical and emotional separation from communities and cultures, leading to feelings of estrangement (Adger et al., 2005). This disconnection weakens social cohesion and community resilience, contributing to mental health issues like depression and anxiety, and undermines efforts to address environmental challenges (Scannell & Gifford, 2017; Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018).

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance in solastalgia occurs when individuals' values conflict with environmental degradation, causing psychological discomfort. People may rationalize their environmentally harmful actions or deny their impact to reduce this discomfort, perpetuating

ecological harm (Festinger, 1957). Guilt, moral disengagement, and internalized conflict exacerbate the psychological distress (Albrecht et al., 2007; Clayton, 2020).

Post-Traumatic Stress

Solastalgia-related post-traumatic stress (PTS) results from exposure to environmental disasters like wildfires or floods. Unlike traditional PTSD, solastalgia-related PTS is chronic, stemming from ongoing environmental degradation (Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018). Symptoms include heightened anxiety, sleep disturbances, and flashbacks (Hegerl & Johannessen, 2018). Intergenerational trauma can also perpetuate the psychological impact, as survivors pass on emotional and ecological burdens (Pihkala, 2020).

Psychological Resilience and Coping

Resilience and coping mechanisms help individuals navigate the emotional impacts of solastalgia. Resilient people maintain emotional equilibrium through practices like mindfulness, while social support networks play a crucial role (Pihkala, 2020). Coping strategies include problem-focused approaches like conservation work and policy advocacy, as well as emotional outlets such as journaling or art (Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018). Community engagement, mental health support, and access to climate change education are vital for fostering resilience and adaptive coping (Clayton, 2020; Harris, 2021).

Public Health Dimensions

The public health implications of solastalgia extend far beyond individual experiences of psychological distress, permeating communities, health systems, and policymaking. Solastalgia, rooted in the intersection of environmental degradation and human well-being, constitutes an emerging crisis with significant public health ramifications. The chronic and systemic nature of environmental changes—deforestation, desertification, urbanization, and climate instability— renders its mental health impacts both pervasive and complex.

Mental Health Impacts

Solastalgia's mental health consequences—such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD—are particularly prevalent in areas facing environmental disruptions. In wildfire-affected Australian communities, 26% of residents reported depression, and 33% experienced significant anxiety two years after the disaster (Bryant et al., 2014). Similarly, communities in Bangladesh affected by rising sea levels and salinization experienced high rates of ecological grief and anxiety, particularly among women and low-income groups (Islam & Winkel, 2017). Unlike acute trauma, solastalgia results from gradual environmental changes, leading to prolonged psychological distress (Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018). Marginalized populations, with limited access to mental health resources, are especially vulnerable (Albrecht et al., 2007).

Social Determinants of Health

Environmental degradation exacerbates socioeconomic inequalities, disrupting livelihoods tied to natural resources. For example, agricultural communities facing drought and deforestation experience economic instability, which intensifies stress and mental health disorders (Islam & Winkel, 2017). Displacement from environmental changes—such as flooding or desertification— further isolates vulnerable populations and disrupts social networks, worsening mental health challenges (Adger et al., 2013). Rural and underserved areas, often the most affected by environmental degradation, lack mental health services, emphasizing the need for equity-driven approaches in healthcare (Watts et al., 2018).

Public Health Infrastructure & Response

Traditional public health systems often overlook the long-term mental health impacts of environmental changes, focusing instead on immediate physical health needs (Osofsky et al., 2008). Addressing solastalgia requires integrating mental health into disaster response and building resilient health systems. Community-based mental health programs and psychological first aid can mitigate long-term effects (Cunsolo Willox et al., 2015). Telemedicine offers a potential solution for providing timely mental health care, especially in remote areas, but must be culturally tailored (Hickman et al., 2021).

Ecological Public Health

Ecological public health focuses on the interplay between human health and environmental sustainability. It emphasizes preventive strategies, such as ecosystem restoration, to address both ecological and psychological impacts of environmental degradation. For instance, community-led reforestation efforts have been shown to improve both environmental conditions and mental well- being (Tidball & Krasny, 2014). Ecosystem restoration projects provide a dual benefit of reducing climate impacts and alleviating solastalgia by fostering a sense of connection to the land (Watts et al., 2018).

Community Resilience & Social Cohesion

Solastalgia can disrupt community identity, but building resilience through social networks and cultural practices can help mitigate its effects. Environmental restoration and shared cultural initiatives foster community cohesion and individual well-being (Cunsolo Willox et al., 2015). Indigenous-led environmental programs, for instance, have re-established cultural ties to the land, enhancing both collective identity and mental health. Empowering local communities through participatory governance and environmental activism helps mitigate feelings of helplessness and strengthens social bonds (Adger et al., 2013).

Vulnerable Populations

Solastalgia, the psychological distress caused by environmental degradation, disproportionately affects marginalized populations already facing social, economic, or geographical challenges. Vulnerable groups such as Indigenous communities, rural populations, the elderly, children, climate migrants, and coastal or island communities are particularly susceptible due to their strong relationships with the environment and varying capacities to adapt to ecological disruptions.

Indigenous communities experience solastalgia acutely, as land degradation disrupts their spiritual, cultural, and subsistence-based ties to the land, exacerbating mental health challenges. Limited access to healthcare and systemic marginalization further hinder their ability to cope (Cunsolo & Ellis, 2018). Collaborative climate adaptation strategies that integrate traditional knowledge have proven helpful in mitigating solastalgia (Whyte, 2018). Rural populations reliant on agriculture and natural resources are also highly vulnerable, as climate change disrupts ecosystems and livelihoods, eroding the sense of place central to their identity (Higginbotham et al., 2007). Limited access to mental health services in rural areas compounds the psychological impacts, with programs integrating mental health support into agricultural services showing promise (Bryant & Garnham, 2015). Older adults face solastalgia as a disruption of their life’s continuity, with deep distress from environmental degradation threatening generational homes (Hess et al., 2014). They are particularly vulnerable due to physical and cognitive limitations. Targeted interventions, such as community engagement and accessible healthcare, are crucial (Keim, 2008). Children and youth, as frontline victims, experience eco-anxiety and existential dread about the future (Hickman et al., 2021). Environmental education programs that engage youth in restoration projects help reduce psychological distress and foster hope (Ojala, 2012). \

Ecological disasters like wildfires and floods intensify solastalgia through immediate displacement and long-term community disruption. Survivors often experience post-traumatic stress, grief, and isolation, with community-driven recovery efforts that prioritize ecological restoration and social cohesion proving effective (Gibbs et al., 2013; Marshall et al., 2016). Climate-induced migration leads to solastalgia as displaced individuals experience cultural dislocation, alienation, and intersecting vulnerabilities. Integrating mental health support into resettlement programs is vital for these populations (McMichael et al., 2012; Adger et al., 2014). Coastal and island communities, facing existential threats from rising sea levels, experience profound solastalgia linked to disappearing land and compromised cultural landmarks (Kelman et al., 2015). For many, land loss is a loss of identity, community, and economic stability. Adaptation strategies like managed retreat and sustainable infrastructure investment are essential, as is global advocacy to secure resources for these communities (Barnett & Campbell, 2010; Thomas et al., 2020).

Major Themes for Measurement

The measurement of solastalgia requires a nuanced approach that captures its complex, multifaceted nature. As the psychological distress linked to environmental degradation, solastalgia extends beyond the individual level and encompasses collective, cultural, and ecological dimensions. To adequately measure its impact, various themes and aspects must be addressed, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of how environmental change shapes emotional and psychological responses.

The core of solastalgia lies in emotional distress caused by environmental degradation, such as grief, anxiety, and helplessness. These responses stem from witnessing ecological destruction like biodiversity loss and deforestation. Tools like the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983), Solastalgia Scale (SOS) (Cacères et al., 2022), and Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) measure the stress and anxiety linked to these environmental changes (Cianconi et al., 2023). Solastalgia arises from severed emotional bonds to specific places due to environmental degradation. This loss impacts identity and belonging (Phillips & Murphy, 2021). Tools like the Place Attachment Scale and Place Identity Scale measure shifts in emotional and cognitive bonds with environments.

Cultural practices and livelihoods tied to the environment are disrupted by degradation, disproportionately impacting vulnerable populations like Indigenous and low-income groups (Kumar et al., 2021). The Cultural Ecosystem Services Framework quantifies cultural well-being losses, while socioeconomic indices contextualize solastalgia in relation to poverty and inequality (White et al., 2023). Intergenerational and Collective Impacts Environmental degradation leads to shared trauma and intergenerational solastalgia. Longitudinal studies and tools like the Collective Trauma Scale assess the psychological impact on groups and future generations (Borges, 2024). Environmental stressors like extreme weather events and deforestation are key drivers of solastalgia. The Environmental Stressor Index and Ecological Distress Scale (EDS) quantify the intensity and psychological impact of these threats (Ferrarello, 2023).

However, solastalgia's subjective, cultural, and long-term nature complicates measurement. Standardization of tools like the SOS is needed to ensure consistency. Cross-cultural variations, socioeconomic disparities, and the collective nature of solastalgia further necessitate nuanced, context-sensitive approaches (Tupou et al., 2023; Askland & Bunn, 2018). This multidimensional framework provides a groundwork for understanding and measuring solastalgia's complex impacts.

Strategies to Address Solastalgia

Addressing solastalgia requires a multifaceted approach that integrates psychological support, community resilience, policy innovation, and societal engagement. Mental health professionals can offer trauma-informed counseling to address eco-distress, including eco-anxiety and eco-grief. Tailored services and community-based resilience programs focused on emotional recovery can significantly alleviate solastalgia (Cianconi et al., 2020; Cunsolo et al., 2020). Strengthening social networks and fostering collective agency can mitigate emotional distress. Grassroots movements and participatory ecological restoration enhance mental well-being while rebuilding a sense of place (Borges, 2024; Kałwak & Weihgold, 2022).

Policymakers should embed solastalgia research into climate adaptation and disaster response strategies. This includes mental health services in disaster relief, environmental education, and local restoration projects to build emotional resilience (Moratis, 2021). Integrating mental health support into resettlement programs for climate migrants can alleviate the psychological toll of displacement while fostering social integration and cultural preservation (McMichael et al., 2012; Adger et al., 2014). Raising awareness of solastalgia can foster empathy and support for climate action. Public education campaigns can highlight the human toll of environmental changes, broadening the understanding of climate impacts (Hickman et al., 2021). Recognizing eco-distress within mental health frameworks allows for comprehensive treatment of related conditions such as PTSD, depression, and anxiety (Rehling & Sigston, 2020; Cianconi et al., 2023).

By integrating these strategies, societies can help individuals and communities cope with solastalgia while fostering resilience in the face of environmental challenges.

Conclusion

Solastalgia emerges as a poignant reflection of the intricate interplay between environmental degradation and human emotional resilience. As this phenomenon underscores the profound psychological toll of ecological disruptions, it necessitates a recalibration of our societal priorities to address not only the tangible consequences of environmental change but also its intangible emotional and cultural impacts. Through this research, the significance of fostering ecological stewardship, community solidarity, and adaptive strategies becomes evident in mitigating the pervasive sense of loss and dislocation solastalgia evokes.

By integrating interdisciplinary approaches—ranging from psychology and public health to urban planning and climate policy—there is an opportunity to craft a holistic framework that prioritizes the well-being of individuals and communities amidst environmental uncertainty. The findings of this study serve as a clarion call for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners to acknowledge solastalgia as a critical facet of the broader climate change narrative. It is only by recognizing and addressing the interwoven threads of ecological and emotional landscapes that we can pave the way toward a more resilient, equitable, and harmonious coexistence with our natural world.

Ultimately, the fight against solastalgia is a testament to our collective capacity to adapt, transform, and thrive in the face of adversity. It challenges us to envision a future where human flourishing and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive but deeply intertwined— a future where hope, connection, and restoration transcend the despair of loss.

References

Ágoston, C., Csaba, B., Nagy, B., Kőváry, Z., Dúll, A., Rácz, J., & Demetrovics, Z. (2022). Identifying types of Eco-Anxiety, Eco-Guilt, Eco-Grief, and Eco-Coping in a Climate-Sensitive Population: a Qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2461. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042461

Alaca, Ç. (2023). Solastalgia and forest fires. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 15(3), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1172916

Albrecht, G. (2005). “Solastalgia”. a new concept in health and identity. PAN: Philosophy Activism Nature, 3, 41. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/584f410704696

Albrecht, G., Sartore, G., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: the distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(1_suppl), S95–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288

Askland, H. H., & Bunn, M. (2018). Lived experiences of environmental change: Solastalgia, power and place. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.02.003

Barbiero, G., Berto, R., Senes, G., & Fumagalli, N. (2023). Wilderness is the prototype of nature regardless of the individual’s connection to nature. an empirical verification of the solastalgia effect. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(14), 6354. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20146354

Baudon, P., & Jachens, L. (2021). A scoping review of interventions for the treatment of Eco-Anxiety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9636. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189636

Bell Legal Group. (2024, October 2). The government ignored Camp Lejeune water contamination studies. https://www.belllegalgroup.com/the-government-ignored-camp-lejeune-

water-contamination-studies/

Borges, R. M. (2024). Solastalgia, our deteriorating environment, and Spirit of Place.

Journal of Biosciences, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-023-00405-8

Bove, F. J., Ruckart, P. Z., Maslia, M., & Larson, T. C. (2014). Evaluation of mortality among marines and navy personnel exposed to contaminated drinking water at USMC base Camp Lejeune: a retrospective cohort study. Environmental Health, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-

069x-13-10

Breth-Petersen, M., Garay, J., Clancy, K., Dickson, M., & Angelo, C. (2023). Homesickness at Home: A scoping review of Solastalgia experiences in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032541

Cáceres, C., Leiva-Bianchi, M., Serrano, C., Ormazábal, Y., Mena, C., & Cantillana, J. C. (2022). What is solastalgia and how is it measured? SOS, a validated scale in population exposed to drought and forest fires. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013682

Calabria, L., & Marks, E. (2024a). A scoping review of the impact of eco-distress and coping with distress on the mental health experiences of climate scientists. Frontiers in Psychology,

15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351428

Calabria, L., & Marks, E. (2024b). A scoping review of the impact of eco-distress and coping with distress on the mental health experiences of climate scientists. Frontiers in Psychology,

15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351428

Cancer incidence study. (2024, November 12). Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/camp-lejeune/health-studies/cancer-incidence-study.html

Carmen, E., Fazey, I., Ross, H., Bedinger, M., Smith, F. M., Prager, K., McClymont, K., & Morrison, D. (2022). Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital. AMBIO, 51(6), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01678-9

Chiolero, A. (2023). Academic framing as a cause of Eco-Anxiety. Epidemiologia, 4(1), 60–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia4010006

Christensen, B. K., Monaghan, C., Stanley, S. K., Walker, I., Leviston, Z., Macleod, E., Rodney, R. M., Greenwood, L., Heffernan, T., Evans, O., Sutherland, S., Reynolds, J., Calear, A. L., Kurz, T., & Lane, J. (2024). The Brief Solastalgia Scale: A Psychometric Evaluation and revision. EcoHealth, 21(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-024-01673-y

Christodoulou, N., Laaidi, K., & Geoffroy, P. A. (2024). Eco‐anxiety: Towards a medical model and the new framework of ecolalgia. Bipolar Disorders, 26(6), 532–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.13446

Cianconi, P., Betrò, S., & Janiri, L. (2020). The Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074

Cianconi, P., Hanife, B., Grillo, F., Betro, S., Lesmana, C. B. J., & Janiri, L. (2023). Eco- emotions and Psychoterratic Syndromes: Reshaping mental health assessment under climate change. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 96(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.59249/earx2427

Clayton, S. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263

Comtesse, H., Ertl, V., Hengst, S. M. C., Rosner, R., & Smid, G. E. (2021). Ecological grief as a response to environmental change: a mental health risk or functional response? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020734

Conroy, G. (2019). ‘Ecological grief’ grips scientists witnessing Great Barrier Reef’s decline. Nature, 573(7774), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02656-8

Council, N. R. (2009). Contaminated water supplies at Camp Lejeune. In National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/12618

Cunsolo, A., Harper, S. L., Minor, K., Hayes, K., Williams, K. G., & Howard, C. (2020). Ecological grief and anxiety: the start of a healthy response to climate change? The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), e261–e263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30144-3

David and Goliath in “Mossville: When Great Trees Fall.” (2024, February 8). School of Public Health | Brown University. https://sph.brown.edu/news/2024-02-08/our-storied-health-

mossville

De Jarnette, J. (2024). Climate change Psychological distress: an underdiagnosed cause of mental health disturbances. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 37(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230169r1

Eisenman, D., McCaffrey, S., Donatello, I., & Marshal, G. (2015). An ecosystems and Vulnerable Populations perspective on solastalgia and psychological distress after a wildfire. EcoHealth, 12(4), 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-015-1052-1

Ferrarello, S. (2023). Solastalgia: Climatic Anxiety—An emotional geography to find our way out. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy a Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 48(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhad006

Foster, S. J. (2022). Eco‐anxiety in everyday life: facing the anxiety and fear of a degraded Earth in analytic work. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 67(5), 1363–1385. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12860

Galway, L. P., Beery, T., Jones-Casey, K., & Tasala, K. (2019). Mapping the Solastalgia Literature: A Scoping Review study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152662

Gawrych, M. (2021). Climate change and mental health: a review of current literature.

Psychiatria Polska, 56(4), 903–915. https://doi.org/10.12740/pp/onlinefirst/131991

Kałwak, W., & Weihgold, V. (2022). The Relationality of Ecological Emotions: An interdisciplinary critique of individual resilience as Psychology’s response to the Climate crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823620

Kumar, P., Kumar, N., & Sarthi, P. P. (2021). Feeling solastalgia: A study of the effects of changing climate in rural India. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12473

Kurth, C., & Pihkala, P. (2022). Eco-anxiety: What it is and why it matters. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.981814

Léger-Goodes, T., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Mastine, T., Généreux, M., Paradis, P., & Camden, C. (2022). Eco-anxiety in children: A scoping review of the mental health impacts of the awareness of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872544

Leviston, Z., Dandy, J., Horwitz, P., & Drake, D. (2023). Anticipating environmental losses: Effects on place attachment and intentions to move. Journal of Migration and Health, 7, 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100152

Mento, C., Damiani, F., La Versa, M., Cedro, C., Muscatello, M. R. A., Bruno, A., Fabio,

R. A., & Silvestri, M. C. (2023). Eco-Anxiety: An Evolutionary Line from Psychology to Psychopathology. Medicina, 59(12), 2053. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59122053

Moratis, L. (2021). Proposing anticipated solastalgia as a new concept on the Human- Ecosystem health nexus. EcoHealth, 18(4), 411–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-021-01537-

9

Nagai, K. (2023). Environmental changes and mental distress in rural communities. Journal of Rural Medicine, 18(2), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2022-058

Pardon, M. K., Dimmock, J., Chande, R., Kondracki, A., Reddick, B., Davis, A., Athan, A., Buoli, M., & Barkin, J. L. (2024). Mental health impacts of climate change and extreme weather events on mothers. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2296818

Patwary, M. M., Bardhan, M., Haque, M. A., Moniruzzaman, S., Gustavsson, J., Khan, M.

M. H., Koivisto, J., Salwa, M., Mashreky, S. R., Rahman, A. F., Tasnim, A., Islam, M. R., Alam,

M. A., Hasan, M., Harun, M. a. Y. A., Nyberg, L., & Islam, M. A. (2024). Impact of extreme weather events on mental health in South and Southeast Asia: A two decades of systematic review of observational studies. Environmental Research, 118436.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118436

Phillips, C., & Murphy, C. (2021). Solastalgia, place attachment and disruption: insights from a coastal community on the front line. Regional Environmental Change, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01778-y

Purifoy, D., & Purifoy, D. (2023, September 27). Breathing while Black in Mossville, Louisiana. Scalawag. https://scalawagmagazine.org/2020/06/mossville-film-review/

Qiu, S., & Qiu, J. (2024). From individual resilience to collective response: reframing ecological emotions as catalysts for holistic environmental engagement. Frontiers in Psychology,

15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363418

Rehling, J., & Sigston, E. (2020). Disrupted attachments to cherished places: Global experiences of ‘solastalgia’ and their clinical implications. Clinical Psychology Forum, 1(332), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2020.1.332.35

Rogers, H. (2016, November 14). How pollution killed a Louisiana town. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2015/11/04/erasing-mossville-how-pollution-killed-a-louisiana-town/

Sisodia, R., & Jobbins, G. (2022). Climate change and psychosocial resilience in drylands: the need for more evidence. International Review of Psychiatry, 34(5), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2022.2118520

Team, C. L. C. C. (2024, August 12). Camp Lejeune Water contamination | Toxic water exposure. Camp Lejeune Claims Center. https://www.camplejeuneclaimscenter.com/water-

contamination/

Testoni, I., Mauchigna, L., Marinoni, G. L., Zamperini, A., Bucuță, M., & Dima, G. (2019). Solastalgia’s mourning and the slowly evolving effect of asbestos pollution: A qualitative study in Italy. Heliyon, 5(12), e03024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03024

To, P., Eboreime, E., & Agyapong, V. I. O. (2021). The Impact of wildfires on Mental Health: A scoping review. Behavioral Sciences, 11(9), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11090126

Tschakert, P., & Tutu, R. (2010). Solastalgia: Environmentally induced distress and migration among Africa’s poor due to climate change. In Springer eBooks (pp. 57–69). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12416-7_5

Tupou, T., Tiatia-Siau, J., Newport, C., Langridge, F., & Tiatia, S. (2023). Is the Concept of Solastalgia Meaningful to Pacific Communities Experiencing Mental Health Distress Due to

Climate Change? An Initial Exploration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(22), 7041. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20227041

Upward, K., Usher, K., Saunders, V., & Maple, M. (2024). Understanding solastalgia from a decolonized, Indigenist lens: a scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1261247

Usher, K., Durkin, J., & Bhullar, N. (2019). Eco‐anxiety: How thinking about climate change‐related environmental decline is affecting our mental health. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(6), 1233–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12673

Warsini, S., Mills, J., & Usher, K. (2014). Solastalgia: living with the environmental damage caused by natural disasters. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 29(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049023x13009266

White, B. P., Breakey, S., Brown, M. J., Smith, J. R., Tarbet, A., Nicholas, P. K., & Ros, A.

M. V. (2023). Mental Health Impacts of Climate Change among Vulnerable Populations Globally: An Integrative review. Annals of Global Health, 89(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4105

Wilder, E. (2024, September 20). They didn’t pay us for our memories: environmental racism, forced displacement, and the industrial buyout of Mossville, Louisiana — University Network for Human Rights. University Network for Human Rights. https://www.humanrightsnetwork.org/publications/mossville-environmental-racism