Skip to main content

Unfreedoms in south India’s tea value chain: reproduction and resistance: Contribution to Globalizations Special Issue on ‘Unfreedom in Labor Relations: from a politics of rescue towards a politics of solidarity?’: Table 1

Unfreedoms in south India’s tea value chain: reproduction and resistance: Contribution to Globalizations Special Issue on ‘Unfreedom in Labor Relations: from a politics of rescue towards a politics of solidarity?’
Table 1

  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources

  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeThe Lives of Women Tea Plantation Workers
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Abstract
  2. 1. Introduction
  3. 2. Understanding coercion and agency in unfree labour
    1. 2.1. Social reproduction and gender in unfree labour
    2. 2.2. Understanding workers’ resistance amidst unfreedom and reproduction
  4. 3. Tying together mixed threads of data
  5. 4. Forms of unfree labour: gendered controls on tea plantation workers’ time
    1. 4.1. Compelled to or kept from work? Gendered notions of unfree labour
    2. 4.2. Pawning off the exit from estate employment
  6. 5. From coping with plantation patriarchy to striking women: tea workers’ resistance
    1. 5.1. Getting by through chit funds
    2. 5.2. Striking women
  7. 6. Discussion and conclusion
  8. Notes
  9. Acknowledgements
  10. Disclosure statement
  11. Funding
  12. Notes on contributors
  13. References

Table 1. Overview estates and research participants by state.
Survey participants (% women / lower castes)FGDs (N women’s / men’s group)Key informant interviews
Tamil Nadu
 A26 (81 / 96)12 / 10CC, M, W
 B20 (90 / 80)11 / 10M, W
 C30 (57 / 69)11 / 4CC, M, W (women, men)
Kerala
 D48 (75 / 100)12 / 8CC, M
 E19 (58 / 90)7 / 8M, W
Notes: CC = certifier’s committee, M = management, W = worker representatives.

‘Lower castes’ groups research participants whose caste is listed as scheduled caste (SC), other eligible communities (OEC) or most backward class (MBC) at national or state level. The share of survey participants belonging to lower castes is calculated as percentage of those respondents whose caste background could be identified.

Annotate

Previous
Gender Justice
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org